readable AI benchmarks (simplified)
LG AI Research
EXAONE 4.5 33B (Reasoning)
EXAONE 4.5 33B (Reasoning) has a Quality Score of 22.5, ranking 353rd among 571 scored models. It has a 262,144 token context window. Its Reliability Score is 24.6, ranking 400th among 573 scored models, below average (total average: 36.5).
Quality Score22.5coverage 100.0%: AA Intelligence and AA-Omniscience outcomes available
Value Scorenot available
Factual reliability24.6
Cache Discountnot available
Model specification
- Reasoning
- reasoning
- Input modalities
- none
- Output modalities
- none
- Context window
- 262,144 tokens
- Weights
- open weights
Token prices USD per 1M tokens
- Input
- not available
- Output
- not available
- Cached Input
- not available
- Cache write
- not available
- Cost per task
- not available
Capability
- Intelligence
- 13.2
- Coding
- not available
- Agentic
- not available
- Omniscience
- -50.7
- Correct
- 16.2%
- Blended price
- not available
Answer outcomes
Fully graded outcomes (Correct + Incorrect): 83.2%
Correct 16.2%Incorrect 67.0%Partial / not attempted 16.8%
Artificial Analysis benchmarks
- GDPval-AA v2
- 0%
- Humanity’s Last Exam
- 13%
- GPQA Diamond
- 79%
- CritPt
- 0%
- AA-Omniscience
- 25%
- AA-LCR
- 55%
Similar models
- K-EXAONE (Reasoning)LG AI ResearchQuality Score 21.6Value Score not available
- EXAONE 4.0 32B (Reasoning)LG AI ResearchQuality Score 16.3Value Score not available
- Exaone 4.0 1.2B (Reasoning)LG AI ResearchQuality Score 9.1Value Score not available
- K-EXAONE 2.0 0803LG AI ResearchQuality Score 38.5Value Score not available
- K-EXAONE (Non-reasoning)LG AI ResearchQuality Score 17.3Value Score not available
- EXAONE 4.0 32B (Non-reasoning)LG AI ResearchQuality Score 14.2Value Score not available