readable AI benchmarks (simplified)
LG AI Research
EXAONE 4.0 32B (Non-reasoning)
EXAONE 4.0 32B (Non-reasoning) has a Quality Score of 14.2, ranking 514th among 571 scored models. It has a 131k token context window. Its Reliability Score is 18.6, ranking 500th among 573 scored models, below average (total average: 36.5).
Quality Score14.2coverage 100.0%: AA Intelligence and AA-Omniscience outcomes available
Value Scorenot available
Factual reliability18.6
Cache Discountnot available
Model specification
- Reasoning
- non-reasoning
- Input modalities
- none
- Output modalities
- none
- Context window
- 131k tokens
- Weights
- open weights
Token prices USD per 1M tokens
- Input
- not available
- Output
- not available
- Cached Input
- not available
- Cache write
- not available
- Cost per task
- not available
Capability
- Intelligence
- 6.3
- Coding
- not available
- Agentic
- not available
- Omniscience
- -62.8
- Correct
- 10.6%
- Blended price
- not available
Answer outcomes
Fully graded outcomes (Correct + Incorrect): 84.0%
Correct 10.6%Incorrect 73.4%Partial / not attempted 16.0%
Artificial Analysis benchmarks
- Humanity’s Last Exam
- 5%
- GPQA Diamond
- 63%
- CritPt
- 0%
- AA-Omniscience
- 19%
Similar models
- K-EXAONE (Non-reasoning)LG AI ResearchQuality Score 17.3Value Score not available
- Exaone 4.0 1.2B (Non-reasoning)LG AI ResearchQuality Score 8.5Value Score not available
- EXAONE 4.0 32B (Reasoning)LG AI ResearchQuality Score 16.3Value Score not available
- Exaone 4.0 1.2B (Reasoning)LG AI ResearchQuality Score 9.1Value Score not available
- K-EXAONE (Reasoning)LG AI ResearchQuality Score 21.6Value Score not available
- EXAONE 4.5 33B (Reasoning)LG AI ResearchQuality Score 22.5Value Score not available