readable AI benchmarks (simplified)
LG AI Research
EXAONE 4.0 32B (Reasoning)
EXAONE 4.0 32B (Reasoning) has a Quality Score of 16.3, ranking 482nd among 577 scored models. It has a 131k token context window. Its Reliability Score is 20.0, ranking 484th among 579 scored models, below average (total average: 36.6).
Quality Score16.3coverage 100.0%: AA Intelligence and AA-Omniscience outcomes available
Value Scorenot available
Factual reliability20.0
Cache Discountnot available
Model specification
- Reasoning
- reasoning
- Input modalities
- none
- Output modalities
- none
- Context window
- 131k tokens
- Weights
- open weights
Token prices USD per 1M tokens
- Input
- not available
- Output
- not available
- Cached Input
- not available
- Cache write
- not available
- Cost per task
- not available
Capability
- Intelligence
- 8.2
- Coding
- not available
- Agentic
- not available
- Omniscience
- -60.1
- Correct
- 13.9%
- Blended price
- not available
Answer outcomes
Fully graded outcomes (Correct + Incorrect): 87.8%
Correct 13.9%Incorrect 73.9%Partial / not attempted 12.2%
Artificial Analysis benchmarks
- Humanity’s Last Exam
- 11%
- GPQA Diamond
- 74%
- CritPt
- 0%
- AA-Omniscience
- 20%
Similar models
- Exaone 4.0 1.2B (Reasoning)LG AI ResearchQuality Score 9.1Value Score not available
- K-EXAONE (Reasoning)LG AI ResearchQuality Score 21.6Value Score not available
- EXAONE 4.5 33B (Reasoning)LG AI ResearchQuality Score 22.5Value Score not available
- K-EXAONE (Non-reasoning)LG AI ResearchQuality Score 17.3Value Score not available
- EXAONE 4.0 32B (Non-reasoning)LG AI ResearchQuality Score 14.2Value Score not available
- K-EXAONE 2.0 0803LG AI ResearchQuality Score 38.5Value Score not available