readable AI benchmarks (simplified)
LG AI Research
Exaone 4.0 1.2B (Reasoning)
Exaone 4.0 1.2B (Reasoning) has a Quality Score of 9.1, ranking 555th among 571 scored models. It has a 64k token context window. Its Reliability Score is 10.1, ranking 559th among 573 scored models, below average (total average: 36.5).
Quality Score9.1coverage 100.0%: AA Intelligence and AA-Omniscience outcomes available
Value Scorenot available
Factual reliability10.1
Cache Discountnot available
Model specification
- Reasoning
- reasoning
- Input modalities
- none
- Output modalities
- none
- Context window
- 64k tokens
- Weights
- open weights
Token prices USD per 1M tokens
- Input
- not available
- Output
- not available
- Cached Input
- not available
- Cache write
- not available
- Cost per task
- not available
Capability
- Intelligence
- 5.3
- Coding
- not available
- Agentic
- not available
- Omniscience
- -79.8
- Correct
- 6.8%
- Blended price
- not available
Answer outcomes
Fully graded outcomes (Correct + Incorrect): 93.5%
Correct 6.8%Incorrect 86.6%Partial / not attempted 6.5%
Artificial Analysis benchmarks
- Humanity’s Last Exam
- 6%
- GPQA Diamond
- 52%
- CritPt
- 0%
- AA-Omniscience
- 10%
- AA-LCR
- 0%
Similar models
- EXAONE 4.0 32B (Reasoning)LG AI ResearchQuality Score 16.3Value Score not available
- K-EXAONE (Reasoning)LG AI ResearchQuality Score 21.6Value Score not available
- EXAONE 4.5 33B (Reasoning)LG AI ResearchQuality Score 22.5Value Score not available
- Exaone 4.0 1.2B (Non-reasoning)LG AI ResearchQuality Score 8.5Value Score not available
- EXAONE 4.0 32B (Non-reasoning)LG AI ResearchQuality Score 14.2Value Score not available
- K-EXAONE (Non-reasoning)LG AI ResearchQuality Score 17.3Value Score not available