readable AI benchmarks (simplified)
InclusionAI
Ling-mini-2.0
Ling-mini-2.0 has a Quality Score of 9.6, ranking 529th among 551 scored models. It has a 131k token context window. Its Reliability Score is 10.8, ranking 537th among 553 scored models, below average (total average: 35.6).
Quality Score9.6coverage 100.0%: AA Intelligence and AA-Omniscience outcomes available
Value Scorenot available
Factual reliability10.8
Cache Discountnot available
Model specification
- Reasoning
- non-reasoning
- Input modalities
- none
- Output modalities
- none
- Context window
- 131k tokens
- Weights
- open weights
Token prices USD per 1M tokens
- Input
- not available
- Output
- not available
- Cached Input
- not available
- Cache write
- not available
- Cost per task
- not available
Capability
- Intelligence
- 5.5
- Coding
- not available
- Agentic
- not available
- Omniscience
- -78.5
- Correct
- 8.9%
- Blended price
- not available
Answer outcomes
Fully graded outcomes (Correct + Incorrect): 96.2%
Correct 8.9%Incorrect 87.4%Partial / not attempted 3.8%
Artificial Analysis benchmarks
- Humanity’s Last Exam
- 5%
- GPQA Diamond
- 56%
- CritPt
- 0%
- AA-Omniscience
- 11%
Similar models
- Ling-flash-2.0InclusionAIQuality Score 15.3Value Score not available
- Ling 2.6 FlashInclusionAIQuality Score 15.9Value Score not available
- Ling-1TInclusionAIQuality Score 18.3Value Score not available
- Ling-2.6-1TInclusionAIQuality Score 25.4Value Score not available
- Ring-flash-2.0InclusionAIQuality Score 15.8Value Score not available
- Ring-1TInclusionAIQuality Score 20.7Value Score not available