readable AI benchmarks (simplified)
InclusionAI
Ling 2.6 Flash
Ling 2.6 Flash has a Quality Score of 15.9, ranking 464th among 551 scored models. It has a 262,144 token context window. Its Reliability Score is 16.9, ranking 499th among 553 scored models, below average (total average: 35.6).
Quality Score15.9coverage 100.0%: AA Intelligence and AA-Omniscience outcomes available
Value Scorenot available
Factual reliability16.9
Cache Discountnot available
Model specification
- Reasoning
- non-reasoning
- Input modalities
- none
- Output modalities
- none
- Context window
- 262,144 tokens
- Weights
- open weights
Token prices USD per 1M tokens
- Input
- not available
- Output
- not available
- Cached Input
- not available
- Cache write
- not available
- Cost per task
- not available
Capability
- Intelligence
- 9.7
- Coding
- not available
- Agentic
- not available
- Omniscience
- -66.1
- Correct
- 15.6%
- Blended price
- not available
Answer outcomes
Fully graded outcomes (Correct + Incorrect): 97.2%
Correct 15.6%Incorrect 81.7%Partial / not attempted 2.8%
Artificial Analysis benchmarks
- GDPval-AA v2
- 0%
- τ³-Banking
- 3%
- Humanity’s Last Exam
- 6%
- GPQA Diamond
- 59%
- CritPt
- 0%
- AA-Omniscience
- 17%
- AA-LCR
- 31%
Similar models
- Ling-flash-2.0InclusionAIQuality Score 15.3Value Score not available
- Ling-1TInclusionAIQuality Score 18.3Value Score not available
- Ling-mini-2.0InclusionAIQuality Score 9.6Value Score not available
- Ling-2.6-1TInclusionAIQuality Score 25.4Value Score not available
- Ring-flash-2.0InclusionAIQuality Score 15.8Value Score not available
- Ring-1TInclusionAIQuality Score 20.7Value Score not available