readable AI benchmarks (simplified)
InclusionAI
Ling-1T
Ling-1T has a Quality Score of 18.3, ranking 422nd among 551 scored models. It has a 128k token context window. Its Reliability Score is 22.4, ranking 427th among 553 scored models, below average (total average: 35.6).
Quality Score18.3coverage 100.0%: AA Intelligence and AA-Omniscience outcomes available
Value Scorenot available
Factual reliability22.4
Cache Discountnot available
Model specification
- Reasoning
- non-reasoning
- Input modalities
- none
- Output modalities
- none
- Context window
- 128k tokens
- Weights
- open weights
Token prices USD per 1M tokens
- Input
- not available
- Output
- not available
- Cached Input
- not available
- Cache write
- not available
- Cost per task
- not available
Capability
- Intelligence
- 9.2
- Coding
- not available
- Agentic
- not available
- Omniscience
- -55.1
- Correct
- 20.3%
- Blended price
- not available
Answer outcomes
Fully graded outcomes (Correct + Incorrect): 95.8%
Correct 20.3%Incorrect 75.5%Partial / not attempted 4.2%
Artificial Analysis benchmarks
- Humanity’s Last Exam
- 7%
- GPQA Diamond
- 72%
- CritPt
- 1%
- AA-Omniscience
- 22%
- AA-LCR
- 37%
Similar models
- Ling 2.6 FlashInclusionAIQuality Score 15.9Value Score not available
- Ling-flash-2.0InclusionAIQuality Score 15.3Value Score not available
- Ling-mini-2.0InclusionAIQuality Score 9.6Value Score not available
- Ling-2.6-1TInclusionAIQuality Score 25.4Value Score not available
- Ring-1TInclusionAIQuality Score 20.7Value Score not available
- Ring-flash-2.0InclusionAIQuality Score 15.8Value Score not available