readable AI benchmarks (simplified)

readable AI benchmarks

Anthropic

Claude Fable 5.1 (Adaptive Reasoning, Xhigh Effort, Default Fallback)

reasoning · closed weights · Sep 1, 2026

Claude Fable 5.1 (Adaptive Reasoning, Xhigh Effort, Default Fallback) has a Quality Score of 81.7, ranking 2nd among 272 scored models. Per 1M tokens, pricing is $10.00 input, $50.00 output, $0.250 cached input, and $12.50 cached output. It accepts text and image input, outputs text, and has a 1M token context window. Its Reliability Score is 71.2, ranking 3rd among 272 scored models, above average (total average: 34.1). Its Value Score is 46.9, high compared with the total Value average of 28.2.

Quality Score81.7coverage 91.2%: missing Epoch General ECI, CursorBench 3.2 and DeepSWE v1.1
Value Score46.9
Reliability71.2
Cache Discount98%

Model specification

Reasoning
reasoning
Input modalities
text, image
Output modalities
text
Context window
1M tokens
Weights
closed weights

Token prices USD per 1M tokens

Input
$10.00
Output
$50.00
Cached Input
$0.250
Cached Output
$12.50
Cost per task
$2.65

Capability

Intelligence
64.8
Coding
80.7
Agentic
59.8
Omniscience
42.4
Correct
66.2%
Blended price
$7.18

Answer outcomes

Attempt rate: 90.0%

Correct 66.2%Incorrect 23.8%Abstained 9.9%

Artificial Analysis benchmarks

GDPval-AA v2
67%
τ³-Banking
46%
Terminal-Bench v2.1
91%
SciCode
60%
Humanity’s Last Exam
59%
GPQA Diamond
93%
CritPt
31%
AA-Omniscience
71%
AA-LCR
78%

Similar models