readable AI benchmarks (simplified)

readable AI benchmarks

Meta

Muse Ember (Max)

reasoning · closed weights · Nov 9, 2026

Muse Ember (Max) has a Quality Score of 44.9, ranking 71st among 245 scored models. Per 1M tokens, pricing is $0.100 input, $0.500 output, and $0.0040 cached input. It has a 1,048,576 token context window. Its Reliability Score is 53.7, ranking 88th among 252 scored models, above average (total average: 47.0). Its Value Score is 41.2, high compared with the total Value average of 28.7.

Quality Score44.9coverage 100.0%: AA Intelligence and AA-Omniscience outcomes available
Value Score41.2
Factual reliability53.7
Cache Discount96%

Model specification

Reasoning
reasoning
Input modalities
none
Output modalities
none
Context window
1,048,576 tokens
Weights
closed weights

Token prices USD per 1M tokens

Input
$0.100
Output
$0.500
Cached Input
$0.0040
Cache write
not available
Cost per task
$0.136

Capability

Intelligence
36.0
Omniscience (native net)
7.4
Correct
21.1%
Blended price
$0.073

Answer outcomes

Fully graded outcomes (Correct + Incorrect): 34.8%

Correct 21.1%Incorrect 13.7%Partial / not attempted 65.2%

Artificial Analysis benchmarks aa-v5

Current Intelligence Index components

AA-Briefcase v1.1
1521.2 Elo
AutomationBench-AA
68.1%
private 657-task split from dataset v1.0.6
GDP.pdf
22.8%
FrontierCode v2.0
27.2%
AA Stirrup · 132 tasks, 3 attempts per task
Terminal-Bench v4.0
40.9%
AA mini-swe-agent standardized runs · 66 tasks, pass@1 averaged over 3 repeats per task
AA-Omniscience v1.1
7.4 native net
HLE-Diamond
25.1%
CritPt v2 Hard
39.0%
AA Stirrup · hard subset, 40 of 70 problems
Terminal-Bench-Science v0.1.0
20.0%

Similar models

Support me! Patreon