readable AI benchmarks (simplified)
Multiverse Computing
HyperNova 60B 2605 (High, Based on gpt-oss-120b)
HyperNova 60B 2605 (High, Based on gpt-oss-120b) has a Quality Score of 20.4, ranking 397th among 571 scored models. It has a 131,072 token context window. Its Reliability Score is 22.7, ranking 440th among 573 scored models, below average (total average: 36.5).
Quality Score20.4coverage 100.0%: AA Intelligence and AA-Omniscience outcomes available
Value Scorenot available
Factual reliability22.7
Cache Discountnot available
Model specification
- Reasoning
- reasoning
- Input modalities
- none
- Output modalities
- none
- Context window
- 131,072 tokens
- Weights
- open weights
Token prices USD per 1M tokens
- Input
- not available
- Output
- not available
- Cached Input
- not available
- Cache write
- not available
- Cost per task
- not available
Capability
- Intelligence
- 11.7
- Coding
- not available
- Agentic
- not available
- Omniscience
- -54.6
- Correct
- 15.2%
- Blended price
- not available
Answer outcomes
Fully graded outcomes (Correct + Incorrect): 85.0%
Correct 15.2%Incorrect 69.8%Partial / not attempted 15.0%
Artificial Analysis benchmarks
- GDPval-AA v2
- 0%
- τ³-Banking
- 6%
- Humanity’s Last Exam
- 17%
- GPQA Diamond
- 73%
- CritPt
- 1%
- AA-Omniscience
- 23%
- AA-LCR
- 36%
Similar models
- Quasar 438B (Max, Based on GLM-5.2)Multiverse ComputingQuality Score 44.9Value Score not available
- Nova 2.0 Lite (Low)AmazonQuality Score 20.6Value Score not available
- HyperCLOVA X SEED Think (32B)NaverQuality Score 20.4Value Score not available
- Qwen3.5 9B (Reasoning)AlibabaQuality Score 20.2Value Score not available
- Nova 2.0 Lite (Medium)AmazonQuality Score 20.4Value Score not available
- Qwen3 VL 32B (Reasoning)AlibabaQuality Score 21.0Value Score not available