readable AI benchmarks (simplified)
Nous Research
Hermes 4 - Llama-3.1 70B (Reasoning)
Hermes 4 - Llama-3.1 70B (Reasoning) has a Quality Score of 18.7, ranking 430th among 571 scored models. It has a 128k token context window. Its Reliability Score is 25.3, ranking 393rd among 573 scored models, below average (total average: 36.5).
Quality Score18.7coverage 100.0%: AA Intelligence and AA-Omniscience outcomes available
Value Scorenot available
Factual reliability25.3
Cache Discountnot available
Model specification
- Reasoning
- reasoning
- Input modalities
- none
- Output modalities
- none
- Context window
- 128k tokens
- Weights
- open weights
Token prices USD per 1M tokens
- Input
- not available
- Output
- not available
- Cached Input
- not available
- Cache write
- not available
- Cost per task
- not available
Capability
- Intelligence
- 7.9
- Coding
- not available
- Agentic
- not available
- Omniscience
- -49.4
- Correct
- 23.5%
- Blended price
- not available
Answer outcomes
Fully graded outcomes (Correct + Incorrect): 96.5%
Correct 23.5%Incorrect 72.9%Partial / not attempted 3.5%
Artificial Analysis benchmarks
- Humanity’s Last Exam
- 9%
- GPQA Diamond
- 70%
- CritPt
- 0%
- AA-Omniscience
- 25%
- AA-LCR
- 10%
Similar models
- Hermes 4 - Llama-3.1 405B (Reasoning)Nous ResearchQuality Score 21.8Value Score not available
- Hermes 4 - Llama-3.1 70B (Non-reasoning)Nous ResearchQuality Score 18.0Value Score not available
- Hermes 4 - Llama-3.1 405B (Non-reasoning)Nous ResearchQuality Score 22.4Value Score not available
- DeepHermes 3 - Mistral 24B Preview (Non-reasoning)Nous ResearchQuality Score not availableValue Score not available
- Hermes 3 - Llama-3.1 70BNous ResearchQuality Score not availableValue Score not available
- DeepHermes 3 - Llama-3.1 8B Preview (Non-reasoning)Nous ResearchQuality Score not availableValue Score not available