readable AI benchmarks (simplified)
Z AI
GLM-4.7 (Non-reasoning)
GLM-4.7 (Non-reasoning) has a Quality Score of 26.5, ranking 292nd among 551 scored models. Per 1M tokens, pricing is $0.600 input, $2.20 output, and $0.285 cached input. It has a 200k token context window. Its Reliability Score is 26.3, ranking 355th among 553 scored models, below average (total average: 35.6). Its Value Score is 20.0, low compared with the total Value average of 30.7.
Quality Score26.5coverage 100.0%: AA Intelligence and AA-Omniscience outcomes available
Value Score20.0
Factual reliability26.3
Cache Discount52%
Model specification
- Reasoning
- non-reasoning
- Input modalities
- none
- Output modalities
- none
- Context window
- 200k tokens
- Weights
- open weights
Token prices USD per 1M tokens
- Input
- $0.600
- Output
- $2.20
- Cached Input
- $0.285
- Cache write
- not available
- Cost per task
- not available
Capability
- Intelligence
- 17.4
- Coding
- not available
- Agentic
- not available
- Omniscience
- -47.3
- Correct
- 23.6%
- Blended price
- $0.540
Answer outcomes
Fully graded outcomes (Correct + Incorrect): 94.6%
Correct 23.6%Incorrect 71.0%Partial / not attempted 5.4%
Artificial Analysis benchmarks
- Humanity’s Last Exam
- 6%
- GPQA Diamond
- 66%
- CritPt
- 0%
- AA-Omniscience
- 26%
- AA-LCR
- 41%
Similar models
- GLM-4.6 (Non-reasoning)Z AIQuality Score 28.6Value Score 21.3
- GLM-4.6V (Non-reasoning)Z AIQuality Score 22.0Value Score 17.9
- GLM-4.7-Flash (Non-reasoning)Z AIQuality Score 15.9Value Score 14.5
- GLM-5 (Non-reasoning)Z AIQuality Score 38.8Value Score 28.6
- GLM-5.1 (Non-reasoning)Z AIQuality Score 38.0Value Score 27.0
- CelerisZ AIQuality Score 16.3Value Score 12.8