readable AI benchmarks (simplified)
Google
Gemma 4 E2B (Reasoning)
Gemma 4 E2B (Reasoning) has a Quality Score of 25.1, ranking 325th among 571 scored models. It has a 128k token context window. Its Reliability Score is 38.2, ranking 255th among 573 scored models, above average (total average: 36.5).
Quality Score25.1coverage 100.0%: AA Intelligence and AA-Omniscience outcomes available
Value Scorenot available
Factual reliability38.2
Cache Discountnot available
Model specification
- Reasoning
- reasoning
- Input modalities
- none
- Output modalities
- none
- Context window
- 128k tokens
- Weights
- open weights
Token prices USD per 1M tokens
- Input
- not available
- Output
- not available
- Cached Input
- not available
- Cache write
- not available
- Cost per task
- not available
Capability
- Intelligence
- 7.8
- Coding
- not available
- Agentic
- not available
- Omniscience
- -23.6
- Correct
- 6.6%
- Blended price
- not available
Answer outcomes
Fully graded outcomes (Correct + Incorrect): 36.8%
Correct 6.6%Incorrect 30.2%Partial / not attempted 63.1%
Artificial Analysis benchmarks
- GDPval-AA v2
- 0%
- Humanity’s Last Exam
- 5%
- GPQA Diamond
- 43%
- CritPt
- 0%
- AA-Omniscience
- 38%
- AA-LCR
- 16%
Similar models
- Gemma 4 E4B (Reasoning)GoogleQuality Score 26.9Value Score not available
- Gemma 4 31B (Reasoning)GoogleQuality Score 24.3Value Score not available
- Gemma 4 26B A4B (Reasoning)GoogleQuality Score 25.1Value Score 22.5
- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite (Reasoning)GoogleQuality Score 20.2Value Score 18.6
- Gemini 2.5 Flash (Reasoning)GoogleQuality Score 27.6Value Score 22.1
- Gemma 4 12B (Reasoning)GoogleQuality Score 22.7Value Score not available