readable AI benchmarks (simplified)
Anthropic
Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High Effort)
Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High Effort) has a Quality Score of 43.1, ranking 143rd among 551 scored models. Per 1M tokens, pricing is $3.00 input, $15.00 output, $0.300 cached input, and $3.75 cache write. It accepts text, image, and pdf input, outputs text, and has a 1M token context window. Its Reliability Score is 48.2, ranking 131st among 553 scored models, above average (total average: 35.6). Its Value Score is 27.3, around average compared with the total Value average of 30.7.
Quality Score43.1coverage 100.0%: AA Intelligence and AA-Omniscience outcomes available
Value Score27.3
Factual reliability48.2
Cache Discount90%
Model specification
- Reasoning
- non-reasoning
- Input modalities
- text, image, pdf
- Output modalities
- text
- Context window
- 1M tokens
- Weights
- closed weights
Token prices USD per 1M tokens
- Input
- $3.00
- Output
- $15.00
- Cached Input
- $0.300
- Cache write
- $3.75
- Cost per task
- not available
Capability
- Intelligence
- 24.7
- Coding
- not available
- Agentic
- not available
- Omniscience
- -3.5
- Correct
- 38.6%
- Blended price
- $2.31
Answer outcomes
Fully graded outcomes (Correct + Incorrect): 80.7%
Correct 38.6%Incorrect 42.1%Partial / not attempted 19.4%
Artificial Analysis benchmarks
- Humanity’s Last Exam
- 13%
- GPQA Diamond
- 80%
- CritPt
- 1%
- AA-Omniscience
- 48%
- AA-LCR
- 68%
Similar models
- Claude Sonnet 5 (Non-reasoning, High Effort)AnthropicQuality Score 42.7Value Score 28.3
- Claude Opus 4.5 (Non-reasoning)AnthropicQuality Score 42.2Value Score 25.2
- Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Non-reasoning, Low Effort)AnthropicQuality Score 42.4Value Score 26.8
- Claude Opus 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High Effort)AnthropicQuality Score 45.9Value Score 27.4
- Claude 4.5 Sonnet (Non-reasoning)AnthropicQuality Score 37.5Value Score 23.8
- Claude 4 Sonnet (Non-reasoning)AnthropicQuality Score 35.5Value Score not available