readable AI benchmarks (simplified)
Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High Effort)
Claude Opus 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High Effort) has a Quality Score of 45.9, ranking 125th among 553 scored models. Per 1M tokens, pricing is $5.00 input, $25.00 output, $0.500 cached input, and $6.25 cache write. It accepts text, image, and pdf input, outputs text, and has a 1M token context window. Its Reliability Score is 51.2, ranking 98th among 555 scored models, above average (total average: 35.7). Its Value Score is 27.4, around average compared with the total Value average of 30.7.
Quality Score45.9coverage 100.0%: AA Intelligence and AA-Omniscience outcomes available
Value Score27.4
Factual reliability51.2
Cache Discount90%
Model specification
- Reasoning
- non-reasoning
- Input modalities
- text, image, pdf
- Output modalities
- text
- Context window
- 1M tokens
- Weights
- closed weights
Token prices USD per 1M tokens
- Input
- $5.00
- Output
- $25.00
- Cached Input
- $0.500
- Cache write
- $6.25
- Cost per task
- not available
Capability
- Intelligence
- 26.4
- Coding
- not available
- Agentic
- not available
- Omniscience
- 2.4
- Correct
- 45.8%
- Blended price
- $3.85
Answer outcomes
Fully graded outcomes (Correct + Incorrect): 89.2%
Correct 45.8%Incorrect 43.4%Partial / not attempted 10.8%
Artificial Analysis benchmarks
- Humanity’s Last Exam
- 19%
- GPQA Diamond
- 84%
- CritPt
- 3%
- AA-Omniscience
- 51%
- AA-LCR
- 67%
Similar models
- Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High Effort)AnthropicQuality Score 43.1Value Score 27.3
- Claude Sonnet 5 (Non-reasoning, High Effort)AnthropicQuality Score 42.7Value Score 28.3
- Claude Opus 4.5 (Non-reasoning)AnthropicQuality Score 42.2Value Score 25.2
- Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Non-reasoning, Low Effort)AnthropicQuality Score 42.4Value Score 26.8
- Claude Opus 4.7 (Non-reasoning, High Effort)AnthropicQuality Score 52.5Value Score 31.3
- Claude 4.5 Sonnet (Non-reasoning)AnthropicQuality Score 37.5Value Score 23.8